Year, mileage: 2008, 180.000 km
Gearbox, drive: ed., front
Engine: 1.4 petrol
Body type: sedan, 4 DV.
Fuel consumption in the city: 7.0 l/100km, road: 5.0 l/100km, average: 6.0l/100km
If tormented with the choice of the car — you will not regret! Bought as needed is economical, cheap to maintain, ideal automatic car every day. For the city, especially the most. Great skarik for the money. Took on a run of 100 tees and skated for 2 years 80 tees. for wear. Nitsche does not break, Yes break then just nothing. Goes always and in any weather. Changed only consumables, But most importantly all the time and observing interval. The parts at the prices on the tune. For comfort far above the frets — still the a / C, automatic. Generally simple and unpretentious, economical to operate if the extra money reluctance to spend on maintenance. Put LPG — 10/100km of gas. For racers I have to say — if the cabin had more than 2 passengers — sometimes you want to get out and push. But go, and economically. Diesel is the best course to take, but they are all on the mechanics. And the 1.6 petrol is a very voracious. Everyone complains about the low clearance — nonsense, even higher than the Mazda, and half of Nissan, and Lanos. Everything is OK!
Before that was: Volga GAZ-3102, Lada 2115, Mercedes E250, Mercedes E220CDI, VITO, Citroen Jumpy, WV Caddy, Mers S320, the Nissan Patrol. Basically, all large and powerful, so when switched to Accent — felt flawed. But the machine did not disappoint, worth the money. Why did you buy it? Had good cars to sell and to buy an apartment, and on blood, something for the movement to take.
Car pros:— Economical consumption.
Car cons:— very weak guise.