Year, mileage: 2018, 5.300 km
Gearbox, drive: ed., full
Engine: 2.5 petrol
Body type: wagon, 5 doors
Fuel consumption in the city: 11.0 l/100km, on the highway: 7.0 l/100km, average: 9.5l/100km
I would like to share my opinion on the car, why the choice fell on this model, what is being compared, and tested in the process of choosing what he is to operate, what to expect the potential buyer and what to avoid.
Perhaps I’ll start with, what is actually in the modern world. For most of you reading, Subaru’s Colin McRae, gold wheels on the blue car with tobacco advertising, the turbo Opotiki, without tower tuning and rally the spirit of the pioneer. It should be noted that all of the above was enough in the distant past. Modern Subaru (except the BRZ and WRX) — it’s not just machines, but a philosophy: permanent symmetrical all-wheel drive for maximum traction, high ground clearance to 22 inches (plus or minus millimeters) to ensure a high fit and easy movement in the city and outside of it, are four, for a low center of gravity, reduced vibrations and increased safety emergency, 7-speed CVT to achieve minimum fuel consumption and provide unprecedented smooth ride. In turn, many of former merit, as speed and agility, had to be abandoned. It is not so critical, but more on that later.
But go to the Outback. Someone can call it a SUV, someone can call an SUV, for some, it is universal. In fact, we need to understand that no one is mislead, what is this car and what it is. Again a reference to the history of the brand, because for the first time, the term SUV (Sport Utility Vehichle) was applied to the Subaru Forester, which acted as a hybrid of the statement of van and SUV. Today, this term implies only «Parquet appearance» and fiction in the form of an electronic pseudo-wheel-drive (Rav4) or simulations change settings of transmission (Peugeot 3008). Outback is not a SUV, because it has like a real drive, and quite suitable for off-road body kit from the protective plastic, and very impressive ground clearance (factors that in the category of SUVs are almost absent). As for the classical notion of the universal — Yes, the car passport is universal, but in my understanding, a universal it is not. The so-called Station Wagon’s, they are also generalists in our, this is a machine with impressive trunk space, which basically are modifications of sedans. But let’s just throw the pure concept, because in fact in the trunk at legacy place not much less, and modifications and customizations to the suspension enough to take this car not just as a «legacy with a hump». Outback is the car that is a station wagon terrain, or (word game) is a «universal machine,» and this quality is exactly what for me personally and determined the choice of the car.
The car is very smooth and quiet to drive in town, riding on the highway is an absolute relaxation process (flow at 150 km/h is around 7-7.5 depending on the time of year and tires) and driving on a dirt track is just wacky sense of fun and desire to remember about rally times, and off-road driving is very real, only it is necessary to follow the angles of entry and exit, as this is the only weak spot. In summary — this machine is well and all can afford a lot. Let’s just say, if you really need a car for any occasion — then this is the perfect choice.
Now a little on certain aspects of the car, I have a maximum on the territory of Ukraine equipment ZO (the difference is in the skin of the cabin, electrogastrogram front seats, and audio system from Harman Cardon):
1) the Engine and transmission.
2.5 liter naturally aspirated 4-cylinder oppozitnik is the heart of most European cars (there is also a 3.6 liter 6-cylinder, but for example in Ukraine it did not deliver). 175 HP 1.7 tons of weight machines are not something supernatural, although the machine is too slow will not name, box CVT so frustrating slow speed set from the start (0-30 km/h), but the dynamics in any other range is decent. The machine is configured to smooth and comfort drive, in all conditions, and drive it not that it is impossible, but not worth it. Would also like to note that the atmospheric engine, and if you live at a high altitude from sea level or in mountainous areas (or passing through such areas), then the car loses power due to atmospheric factors, keep in mind. It is also worth noting that in the Outback there are two modes of operation of the engine with a box — I (Inteligent), which adapts to the driver and provides maximum comfort with fuel economy (except the kickdown mode, the machine operates in the range 1200-3800 revs, do not hesitate to step things up a gear to lower revs), and S (Sport), which dramatically transforms the car, increasing average momentum, zakidyvaya more combustible mixture in the combustion chamber, increasing the maximum revs to the red zone. In fact, the car in S mode is something other beast, and recommended after the initial running in of 1500 km, when I first activated it — quite pleasantly surprised. 0-100 this figure is completely irrelevant to the Outback, because in any case the first few dozen kilometers per hour will be slow and character of the traffic light you not be, but outside this range the machine is fast. Also, there is a manual mode box, where you can use paddle shifters (in General they can lay at any time, but only in manual mode, the machine will not give priorities to their algorithms), with the fun fact that the dial of the speedometer and tachometer will turn orange when you switch to manual mode. Little thing, but smiling. #Japanese. About the Converter: the torque Converter throws momentum into the box, where it is used to wedge the chain instead of the usual strap that ceases to be a gimmick. Resource box allows to cover 220 thousand and more without major repairs, but should notify that the repair of the box itself in case of wear of the chain can not be, and it just need to be changed. No, it’s not that it can not be repaired, a replacement box is likely to be cheaper. Why many concerned about the box, however, the same planetary axis and dual-clutch can go from a working condition much earlier and cost no less. Just the fact that the variator and the other one now it can’t make — doesn’t mean that when you need repairs, nobody will be able to fix it. More than sure that in a couple of years variator for mechanics will be no more difficult other box for repair.
I think there is no sense long to speak that the machine does not go, and floats down the road in style and confident of a massive battleship. Light bumps just disappear in the light working out pendants, medium-sized bumps and potholes do not cause any complaints, heavy the defects of the road the car moves with a decent exposure, let the sound rebound of the suspension does not cause joy, but the Outback confidently overcomes any road conditions. The only thing that is the worst enemy of the Outback — it «jumps»: the car loves to bounce because of the soft suspension, and if you fall on cascade road with undulating sections «above-below», it can start to really jump, which leads to increased load on the suspension, and quite unpleasant momentary loss of control. Nothing critical, but keep in mind, because it’s the only thing that caused me to fear driving for the first 5000 operation. About four-wheel drive mode and X-mode… Us here in the week covered with snow, fell about 40 inches of rain (well, it is clear that the bottom layer has melted), and even in such circumstances, I never even thought about it. The machine itself the all-wheel drive climbs of any terms that I at the moment have been. Start in the steep slippery hill? Easy. Snow? Do not tell. Ice? If you don’t want, the machine does everything by the book. Yet I think, where would I find the test for the X-mode to test, because it really did not include never.
3) the Interior and ergonomics.
The Japanese was aiming at the American market with the development of the salon, and frankly — it is excellent. The seats are comfortable, convenient, moderately active lateral support. Seat adjustment are very varied (height, angle of seat cushion, adjustment of the back support and lumbar), head restraint elastic and even harsh for those who like to sleep on it do not like it, but change the angle of the head restraint. The rear seats fold in 60/40 proportions, and have the ability to recline the backrest in the same ratio (near the door are two levers that recline the seats degrees conditionally 10), providing excellent comfort, while the amount of space on the second row is just crazy. The car has 4 compartments for bottles in the doors (0.5-0.75 intermeddle quietly, more depending on bottle shape), 4 Cup holders (two between the gear lever and podokonnoj console, two rear drop-down armrest), there are several USB connectors, two on the rear for charging phones or other electronic devices on the second row. The interior is made in classic style, with psevdoderevo and metal, most materials are soft-touch plastic, leather in the cabin are of good quality and pleasant to the touch. The upper part of the torpedo closed anti-reflective material for providing great ride comfort when driving (simply no glare from the sun on the dashboard), and protects the camera system Eye-sight from zaleplena. However, the salon has a few unpleasant moments: bardock small enough section points under a small panel on the door adjustable glass and mirrors in contact in a certain place nasty knocks/creaks, and at a certain landing a knee as the time you get there. Also, the driver seat cushion in the left corner emits a fairly nasty creaking. Overall, the ride comfort is high, the soundproofing allows you to calmly go with the audio volume 5-6 (out of 30) and not hear any ambient noise up to 150-160 km/h is where it starts to be active audible turbulence in the area of the mirrors and rails in the roof. In contrast to the model of the previous generation (before the restyling), arches are well insulated and wheels are not heard. To sit five of them in the car, but the transmission Assembly tunnel is large enough. The belt of the average passenger is hiding in the roof, if it is the latch strap is hidden in a niche and no noise, there is also an additional latch, which keeps the belt from above and provides a fixing belt around the waist when landing (there once to see, nothing complicated, everything is reasonable). Has heated all seats (except the stools in the middle), rear glass and mirrors (it’s one button), and a heated steering wheel. A good multimedia system, colorful screen, the touch screen is very nimble and responsive. Sound system Harman Cardon wonderful and takes quality over volume, although the volume and can be unscrewed on the offensive, but no need or no desire.
4) the Trunk: wagon it is not too large, the low height of the useful space to a blind trunk with folded seats, the Luggage space is simply enormous. I highly recommend not to spare money on the Mat-tray in the trunk and pads on the rear part of the seats (if possible, load the photo). There are hooks for holding packages from the supermarket or similar goods, can be attached to the grid.
5) driving the Process.
The car is very good, visibility excellent, easy to steer and simple, the machine is intuitive from the first time, dimensions felt quite sure. Low center of gravity thanks are the engine plays a role, and the car does not feel as «jeep». To be honest, I would rather call the feeling in a certain turnover «wagon frame»: some valkosti and rolls are present, but they absolutely do not interfere and what the emotions do not cause. However, poor coating, I would not recommend to go more than 150 machine have to actively catch, if the road is good quality — surely drown.
6) the Appearance and all sorts of chips.
The visual component of the car, I appreciate and paint will not, then everybody on the fan, but I definitely like some old school, inherent in this model. Excellent lights, Led, dipped beam is quite far shining, far shines for about 300 meters forward at least, while the lights rotate with the wheel movement to provide illumination on the really necessary parts of the road, not people on the opposite line. Conveniently, I tell you. Of interesting features: roof rails the roof has an interesting design and can be both longitudinal and transverse, while the transformation is simple and logical, all you need is to bend the rivet and throw one end of the rails to the other side where the pin back in place. The machine is equipped with system of monitoring of blind zones, which is always handy. Is PDC worth three cameras: front in the grille, near the rear license plate, and side in the right mirror, facing forward, while there is a control system of low-speed collisions (the car is sensing close to the obstacle, hit the brakes and/or will not allow to go further, if not actively pushing the gas, both when driving forwards and backwards). Also, it is necessary to explain what Eye-sight. This system active driver assistance when driving, which consists of two cameras inside the cabin above the windshield, which can notify about the unintended impact on the strip, to prevent the sudden obstacle, or even hit the brakes if the driver does not take active steps to avoid collisions. Once notified that the system wrests control from the driver, but only warns. Emergency braking is another story. The cruise control also uses some capabilities of the system Eye-sight, for example, there is a button «control strip» where the vehicle will actively signal and to trim the steering wheel when driving over the markings. However, it is not the autopilot, but rather a means of defense against driver fatigue and falling asleep at the wheel. Please, drive carefully.
And, you can change the backlight colour of the speedometer and tachometer. Don’t ask why. Just.
Now actually about why the choice fell on the Outback. The car I chose for a good six months, and in the process passed the test-drives of 42 different cars and models were tested in completely different conditions, in the period spring-summer. It is an adequate question would be to the reader — why I transplanted in the Outback and why such a choice. Used Peugeot 308 wagon in the database (1.6 diesel + mechanic), as I traveled, it was necessary to save on cost (consumption 4.2 diesel per 100 on the highway) and needed a large trunk. I want to say to all the skeptics that Peugeot (and in General French cars) raise your level and offer some very interesting features, but the 308 in particular suffered greatly from the abominable roads of our small ground clearance, soft suspension and very short-stroke, easy breakdown of the suspension if such a terrible potholes. Not for our corners this machine, so a year later decided to take one car for all occasions.
In the list of «needs» was the ride comfort, the availability of space in the boot, an adequate consumption of normal reserve power for overtaking on the track, and preferably in the format of the station wagon (Yes, I’m a freak on universals, not like the sedans). In the selection process have disappeared from almost all Germans (Golf is the same 308, only much more expensive, too expensive for the Tiguan small SUV, the AUDI has disappeared due to tsenovoy policy and costly maintenance, BMW of the last ten years do not think about the car, after level brand in the 90s). Total sample my first cars were: Skoda Superb (wagon), Opel Insignia, Volvo XC60, Volvo V90. In the end, all these machines were screened out due to certain factors: Skoda seemed too cotton and boring, both in the cabin and while driving (under the body the same VW), Opel is like in the test drive and appearance, and cabin, but is scared of the new technology of a full drive (it is interesting to find and read, there is a very interesting design), which is nowhere and no one has been proven or tested, it is not able to find any real driver who would buy the Insignia of the new generation and could share experiences (well, the price tag with nice options went far beyond a comfortable amount, 2.2 diesel with all-wheel drive were sold for 50 thousand green banknotes). Volvo is Volvo, but frankly, again, all boils down to the amount. While both models are not very nice endured bad roads, again machine sharpened to urban use. Realizing the problem of our roads, and accepting the idea that maybe it’s time to look at station wagons, and SUVs, has decided to expand the list of cars, and began to test the Peugeot 3008, Nissan X-trail, Toyota Rav4. Frankly every machine was what good, what g*contrib. Peugeot the car is great, interior the i-cockpit is simply divine in terms of convenience, but the lack of AWD was for me the cornerstone of failure. Nissan surprised in a negative way (common Renault Koleos and the other one was better for less money), and Toyota (RAV4 hybrid) again showed themselves in a crumbling cabin and constant noise in completely strange places (who knows will understand, the Toyota many years the problem with the build quality and Shumka salon, although models 17-18 slowly get rid of this curse).
Many test drives later, I still remembered the existence of the Subaru, while a test drive was in early spring in the nasty weather with ice and Outback shook his qualities.
In the end, I came to the following list for consideration: Subaru Outback, Mitsubishi Pajero Sport, Ford edge and Toyota Khaylender.
Write out in detail why I think these cars are competitors, and why the choice ultimately fell on the Outback.
Mitsubishi I ran in on the test drives more than once — and the roads and lack of roads, and on the wild off-road ride we had. Yeah, it’s one of the few of the latter kind of ramnicul and his element is the lack of roads. The car was very good and sure, but everything depends on the question that the salon jumped straight from Pajero 95-year button, rough, old, the impression that in the 90s produced a few million more, so continue to push on. Yeah, toggle-switches the size of a finger is convenient when you are out fishing or hunting with gloves on, but in normal use this is the surprise. The rear seats are again more like a Field than anything Japanese. Landing of the driver was satisfactory, but the test machine I keep that clings to the leg over the pedal (I did not understand, whether there is something in the test machine, fell off, or so it should). Well, the opposite: the wheel of any irregularities shakes and breaks free from his hands. Riding faster hundreds was the fear at the bumps in the road. In General, the aggregate backward technology, poor ergonomics and dangerous steering, I refused the Pajero Sport (the cost, incidentally, is similar to the Outback we have in the area of 40 thousand dollars).
Ford edge was a good car, it’s a big SUV with a bright (for a class) interior, good ride, huge trunk, excellent power… But huge consumption, unsuitable for such a colossus brakes and a fairly expensive service. And if the flow is still «fuck him», then brake really strained: even with my careful driving style and pre-braking, I felt the desire to push hard (maybe the nuance here is that in my 308 Peugeot brakes were fantastic, almost the best element of the machine). All these factors together and the price tag Ford is also eliminated.
About the Highlander also bad to say little, except that he has a very bad engine for our market (large volume, large flow, not such a big capacity), which is long overdue to change, and a price tag of 60 thousand. The Highlander is closer to the family minivan analogues with high traffic. A little something that was needed.
I bought the Outback, completely satisfied.
First service visit at 5000 was worth $ 110, filter-oil and inspection-lifting suspension and optics.
Of the disadvantages or defects or disadvantages:
During break-in (conditionally of up to 1500 km) the fuel consumption will be increased, however, immediately after overcoming this level the consumption falls to the factory.
The pressure sensors in the tires does not start on their own, their services were «awakened», but this is a banal trifle.
back brush glass cleaner. water, mud prefers to smear, but the problem is the washer: two small jets not spraying liquid and spill, and its volume is little for a normal clean glass.
If you are interested in any questions, ready to answer. The car is really worthy, has one of the best costs for a real wheel drive, with the concept operated as a passenger (albeit heavy) car seat bunch.
The only thing that… I would buy a car without CVT and with no Eye-sight’and would receive no less pleasure. In America such configuration really is, but there are only two departments of Subaru, Central Japan and in the United States. So, machine USA only do under the United States and Canada, and Japan makes some other equipment and supplies throughout the world. In fact, in the US, Subaru is considered a top 3 car in terms of reliability (along with Toyota and Lexus).
In fact, perhaps the biggest problem of Subaru in our market is the fact that the car does not compare with those competitors do not understand the real value of some nodes, technology, or chips (e.g. Eye-sight saves you from 90% of random small accidents, and design are engine with cardan shaft is made in such a way as to «fold» under the car and to ensure the security of passengers in the cabin, thus the Outback in the lead for the security of all ratings), respectively, and form a wrong assessment of the product, and bundling fixed and somewhat limited in variability. This is a truly versatile machine that in any weather, in any conditions, on the road or not, you will be able to deliver to the destination.
Car pros:— Versatility.
Cons of the car:— slight lack of power.
Advice to buyer: This is a great car for all occasions.