Review of Mazda CX-5 2.0 l 2017 from Dmitry from Kharkov

Mazda CX-5

Year, mileage: 2017, 600 km
Gearbox, drive: ed., front
Engine: 2.0 petrol
Set:touring
Body type: SUV, 5 DV.

Reliability
Comfort
Running
Appearance
Overall rating

Fuel consumption in the city: 12.4 l/100km, extra urban: 0.0 l/100km, average: 0.0l/100km

Bought the car in late September, but started to go only in the last month. Chose from different types of bodies (and therefore compare not very well) and eventually settled on the Mazda CX-5. Ordered in July, the car came in September. Picked up the car white because I think that it the car looks the most beautiful.

Package Turing is considered the most adequate in terms of price/quality. It has everything you need. Option added metal engine protection, rubber mats in interior and trunk, the additional grid in front of the radiator (and the stones get smaller and the machine looks better) Korean plus winter tires (all agreed in the salon to get as gifts).

Overall first impressions are very positive of the benefits allocated to:

Bright exterior design, and modern without trying too hard.
— Loved the room — all high quality and the classic «dear» design» even without the skin. Strangely enough, he reminded me of a German car which went before)))
Very good smoothness and silence.
— Optimum size (for me).
The spacious interior.
— The feeling of the expensive car, it seems that it is more expensive than it really is.
— New model, though several years will be relevant and morally obsolete immediately.
— Rear view camera, the trunk itself is raised and lowered, etc. in Short, without these options you can live, but get used to good things very quickly))). Then there is the rear of the chamber, the chamber is fully offset, meaning there is extra money not see.

Of the minuses I saw in such a short period of operation:

— A little «hang» legs over the driver seat cushion. You can omit the seat to make a more recumbent landing, but then immediately degrades visibility in my growth of 180 cm and Think it’s epic fail for ergonomics.
— Place the left foot no rubber grips get dirty very quickly.
— Rear halogen headlights. The question is not even in aesthetics (it does not bother me), the illumination area when the dimensions are very small, so, in my subjective feeling, the cars behind notice my car later. It is rather a question of security.

Go in the center of Kharkov on the big tubes, small moving temperature slightly above 0 + running. Real consumption is 12.4 liters. I hope in the future will decrease, so long as the negative is not recorded. On the road don’t go.

Acceleration dynamic average — not a rocket, but not a vegetable. Enough for me. Great momentum while not giving.

In General the car is very happy, until the impressions are good cons — does not matter. Then we’ll see.

Добавить комментарий